Dying, wonderful music and standing with Wisconsin’s demonstrators

I frequently struggle to think of a topic for this blog and today I decided I wouldn’t try to come up with one. Instead I’d do what many bloggers do and talk about a variety of topics briefly, but I hope provocatively. For example, I had meant to reply to Judith Acosta’s recent post about American attitudes about dying. Nothing she said struck me as especially original but it may not be possible to write about death with any originality. It was a thoughtful and positive essay. I was surprised she didn’t mention the nano technologies that some people hope will end death, or at least human death, not because I think they’ll succeed or fail but because they say something about the desperation with which human beings cling to hope of immortality. Also, I find the remote possibility of an end to dying bends my perspective just enough so that I begin to think about death and dying in a positive way—as part of life and living. Although I’m sure that’s all to the good, dying still scares the hell out of me.

I was struck by Ms. Acosta’s claim that she was no longer afraid of death. Back in the late 1980s a casual but greatly loved friend of mine died unexpectedly. Or at least I didn’t expect it. I found myself worrying that she might have been terrified by the suddenness of it. A much closer friend to her than I was, and a pastor’s wife to boot, had been with her when it happened and when I ran into her not long after at some kind of town event I blurted out my concern. I think she was taken aback—perhaps it seemed like a very personal question in a public place—but her answer was straight forward and it’s stayed with me to this day.

“Of course. What was happening was entirely new and different—of course, she was anxious and afraid.”

It was such an obvious answer. One of those “why didn’t I think of that?” kinds of remarks.

Different perspectives can also be confusing.

Other subjects. I have several Facebook nieces, the kinds of nieces who are related only by civil unions past and present. One, who’s a remarkable violist, just passed on an incredible performance from Theodora, a Handel oratorio, sung by the late Lorraine Hunt Lieberson (who had also been a violist). It’s on YouTube. It’s extraordinarily moving and oh, how I wish she hadn’t died. But my god, what she left to the rest of us!

Like most of the people I know, I’ve been excited by the freedom movements in the Middle East and made hopeful, despite all, by the demonstrations in Wisconsin. That people from Egypt were among those ordering pizza for the demonstrators delights me. I hope to go to our state’s rally on Saturday (Montpelier, Vermont at 12 noon), when people will mass on the steps of state houses across the country. I hope those of you who can will think about doing the same! If you want some inspiration read Ronni Bennett’s post (February 25) on Time Goes By and pray she’s right!!!

Remembering is so complicated, how do we do it …. ?

I’m still reading Searching for Memory:The Brain, The Mind and The Past. It’s a long book and I may be at it for some time, but never fear. That doesn’t mean that every post will be about it, especially as I’m finding it somewhat dispiriting. Most of the book is about the complexities of remembering. It’s not just that memories aren’t like the movies. They’re the product of scraps of things actually remembered, and of the hard work of reconstruction of time past—using the expectations, the imagination, the general knowledge of the self and life, and God only knows what else.  As I said, I’m still reading.

Nevertheless, Daniel Schecter, the author, does close on an uplifting note (yes, I’m one of those people who read the conclusion of a book before its middle):

On balance, however, our memory systems do a remarkably good job of preserving the general contours of our pasts and of recording correctly many of the important things that have happened to us. We could not have evolved as a species otherwise. Memory is a central part of the brain’s attempt to make sense of experience, and to tell coherent stories about it. These tales are all we have of our pasts, and so they are potent determinants of how we view ourselves and what we do. Yet our stories are built from nay different ingredients: snippets of what actually happened, thoughts about what might have happened, and beliefs that guide us as we attempt to remember. Our memories are the fragile but powerful products of what we recall from the past, believe about the present, and imagine about the future.

One more note: Schecter cites the tendency of older people to think about the past. There was a time when it was thought that “living in the past” would produce depression and despair. The attendants in nursing homes discouraged it and recommended bingo instead. Today, older people in institutional settings and without, are encouraged to tell their stories of the past.
Schecter worries that computer memory is replacing the story teller in our culture. If he were writing today instead of the 1990s he might be reassured: the many, many blogs by older writers on the internet are filled with stories of the past. The genealogy and the oral histories that it encourages are greeted enthusiastically by the culture.
Schecter argues that elderly story tellers play a major and creative role in connecting the past with the present. One of the most damaging things done to Native American societies was the discrediting of the elderly story tellers in their midst.

In today’s Time Goes By (still the premier blog for issues related to aging), Ronni Bennett talks about a New Year’s article by Oliver Sacks in the New York Times about the plasticity of the brain and how it can be rewired by most of us. He writes:

While some areas of the brain are hard-wired from birth or early childhood, other areas—especially in the cerebral cortex, which is central to higher cognitive powers like language and thought, as well as sensory and motor functions—can be, to a remarkable extent, rewired as we grow older.

While this is no longer news, it’s  just as exciting as it was the first day it was cited. As usual, Sacks makes the subject come alive with stories of individuals who have put it to the test. But he also poses some interesting questions: “That the brain is capable of such radical adaptation raises deep questions. To what extent are we shaped by, and to what degree do we shape, our own brains? And can the brain’s ability to change be harnessed to give us greater cognitive powers? ….”

My favorite example is that of Eliza Bussey, “a journalist in her mid-50s who now studies harp at the Peabody Conservatory in Baltimore, who could not read a note of music a few years ago. “In a letter to me,”  says Sacks,  “she wrote about what it was like learning to play Handel’s “’Passacaille:’” ‘I have felt, for example, my brain and fingers trying to connect, to form new synapese. … I know that my brain has dramatically changed.’”

And since I’ve been trying to play the piano again in my late 60s and 70s—hoping against hope that there will be no arthritis, no stroke, not anything, to stop me… Eliza Bussey’s story is one I especially like.

Photo by Jeff Greenwood. Flickr. Creative Commons.

The ways a writer – or at least this one – remembers

In her latest post, Ronni Bennett at Time Goes By cites the latest studies showing that the brain doesn’t necessarily deteriorate as we grow older. Over the last decade, there’s been increasing evidence that it’s not so much that we remember less; it’s that we remember differently.  While short-term memory declines with old age, long-term memory seems to be enhanced. Older people generally are given to remembering; they use the past in the present, in their day-to-day living of it.  If they’re artists, they use it in their creative endeavors.

It seems to me that another reason the past is so important at this age is that we’re closer to the end. There is less future to contemplate, and a lot more past. We may not be into summing up our lives just yet, but we tend to see them whole in a way that we didn’t when we were younger. A writer, at least this writer, may see her characters in the same way – with a beginning, middle, and end. Whole. Even if the story, novel or poem doesn’t actually describe the whole.

I think of the past as a wonderful treasure trove. As I dig, more keeps being unearthed. Like the rocks in New England that seem to re-emerge each year even though I thought we’d dug them all last spring. There’s always more to be discovered. That doesn’t have to mean the details of my living – the kind of icing on my fourth birthday cake, the name of my first bicycle, my grandmother’s hairstyle….   It can mean the surprise of an imagined character, place or action. I don’t know quite how I understand that that’s how it would have been: it simply makes sense when I write it. Somehow, I know, and I know because of what I remember without knowing exactly what that is.

Watching my mother die with Alzheimer’s, I learned a lot about memory. Most of all, I learned that it’s not just memories that we lose when we lose memory, it’s the framework and context for everything we are and do, for the meaning of our lives.

Here’s a draft excerpt from Digging to Russia, a book I’m slowly, slowly writing. It’s easier to share it here, then write what I’m trying to say for this post in post language.

It’s not exactly true that what we are is what we remember, is it? Our memories aren’t stacked inside of us like dominoes. You remove some and they all go tumbling. Or like a jigsaw puzzle – lose enough pieces and the picture no longer makes much sense. Our memories aren’t us, there’s something else there holding us together, and yet my past leads into my present. My present is rooted in my past, and starts crumbling when the past does.

One day I asked my mother if she’d like us to go through the story of her life together. I saw her hesitate. On the one hand, she enjoyed hearing things about herself that she’d forgotten; they verified her existence. On the other, she didn’t want anyone to know how little she remembered, to see the holes in the cloth of her life, to discover that she was so scantily dressed it was embarrassing.

Worst of all, even though we put the pieces together they’d be lost to her again by the time we finished, or sooner. She’d be stripped down all over again.

We sat in her room at the Home – a bevy of mothers, fathers and grandmothers, brothers and sisters, her husband, her children staring down at us from the photos on the wall. “I don’t want those there,” she told me yesterday. “Take them away.” They’d been on her bedroom wall for twenty years, maybe more, but now she wanted them gone. They taunted her. She didn’t know who those people were; she wasn’t even sure she wanted to know anymore.

I made sure her back was to them.

We would start as near the beginning as we could – a good place to start since that’s where she’d mostly been left. On another wall, hanging in view of both of us, was her baptismal certificate or, in ornate German letters, Tauf Schein. A fair-skinned Jesus wreathed in vines stood on a stone pedestal and reached out with welcoming arms.

“Alicea Albertine Wacker, tochter von Jacob Wacker and seiner Ehefrau Katherine geb. Borger ist am 14 November 1917 in der Evang. Luth. Friedenkirche in namen des Dreieinigen Gottes getauft worden.” In the name of the Three-in-One-God. Born again.

“Do you remember your baptism? You were three years old. I wonder why they waited so long.”

Grandma had lost two children by then. Two still births, and granddad another by his first wife. Maybe they were waiting to make sure this one would live. There was a dove on the certificate, but the first of the Three-in-one-God is missing. Where’s God the Father?

“I don’t remember.”

“That’s not surprising. You were very young.”

I tried to remember it for her. Granddad, costumed for the occasion in his Sunday suit, grave, distracted, worrying about a disappointing beet harvest. Grandma, dressed in her only best dress, a busy flower print, earnest, yearning for God. Thin-as-a-rail-Herr Rolf Steinhauer and plump, red-cheeked Herr Albert Rothe, both there to witness, Herr Rothe holding Alicea in his arms. Beside him, his beaming frau. Pastor Amen, looking a little silly, his side-whiskers twitching when he talks, sprinkling water on Alicea, making her giggle because the water is dribbling down her forehead to her nose. It tickles. Above her the Holy Spirit is flying around in the eves while Jesus watches tenderly from a stained glass window.

“Do you remember the church?”

“Yes. Mom, Pop, and…

“Your brother, Clarence.”

“He was a good brother.”

“Did you sing in church?”

“Oh, yes. We sang.” She sang in a small wavering voice:

So nimm denn meine Hände und führe mich bis an mein selig Ende und ewiglich.
Ich mag allein nicht gehen, nicht einen Schritt: wo du wirst gehn und stehen, da nimm mich mit.

I imagined her, tiny, blue-eyed, with her kid’s thin, high-pitched voice, stuffed into a congregation of gutteral harmonies, caught in a press of big coats damp from the snow. There are no pictures of God the Father but she always thought of Him when she smelled dank wool.

“Did you always believe in God?” That wasn’t a fair question, was it? Would she recall if she hadn’t? Mightn’t a God denial be one of the first things in her memory bank to go?

“Of course.”

“Everybody in the family believed in God, didn’t they?”

“Of course. Why wouldn’t they?”

“What about Uncle Heine?”

She looks worried. “I’m not sure. We’ll have to ask him,” she replied. “Heine’s crazy,” she added in a hushed tone so no one would hear.

“Did you ever try to dig a hole to China?”

“That would be a dumb thing to do,” she said.

“To Russia, then?”

“Even dumber,” she laughed. She stopped abruptly and frowned. “Let’s get on with it,” she said, irritated that the story of her life was so slow to unfold.

“Didn’t you do anything dumb when you were a kid?” I persisted.

She smiled the little girl smile that’s persuaded the staff at the Home that she’s sweet. “I got lost,” she said. “I was trying to shake salt on a wild turkey’s tail.”

“Now that,” I grinned, “is a dumb thing to do. Why did you do it?”

“To tame him. Uncle Heine told me that if I salted its tail, the turkey would be my friend. So I took mom’s salt shaker and a long blue ribbon to leash him and went looking.”

I’m glad that the hole to Russia was mine alone. That she has her own ambition to remember, to tame a funny looking bird as big as herself, to make a friend of it, to loop a blue ribbon around its odd neck and bring it home, to sit on the steps with it and share secrets. “Was Grandma mad that you took her salt shaker?”

No. Mom thought it was funny. Pop was mad because I got way the other side of the wheat field.”

I wondered, was he angry with Heine for telling her the turkey story? He was a grim man, Granddad Jake, during my mother’s growing up. When he came in to eat, everyone kept quiet because that’s what you did when a German farmer came in from the fields. He didn’t talk to his family. She’s told me many times that she was afraid of him. Not to get Freudian about it – that’s passé and I haven’t done it for years – but did Granddad’s grimness set up all the men that followed him in my mother’s life? Including my father?

“They were very proud of you, you know. Both Grandma and Granddad.”

She lit up for a moment. Poor pale wisp of a woman, bent and beaten. Lights up and got that sweet look again. “I know,” she said.

Well, I thought, we might as well remember the most traumatic event of her life next. Chronologically, it made sense, and it was something that stayed with her in some form. For weeks she had talked about it. Is the memory, what she had of it, still there?

“They must have been so upset when you got shot.”

“Yes. I got shot you know. I’ve been shot.”

I nodded. “Tell me about it.”

“They took me to Denver in the train,” she said proudly. “All the way to Denver.”

“Did it hurt?” I asked.

“I remember Heine holding me on the train.”

Heine?

When she did her genealogy, she collected the newspaper item about it; I’ve looked at it with her. “Killed While Playing With Shotgun.” It was a cool, sweet-smelling evening and Grandma and Granddad were away for a few hours, maybe at church worshipping the God who lets terrible things happen. The children were outside on the front lawn. Cousins George and Tillie, ages five and six, were making my high chair-bound four-year-old mother laugh. Her little brother, Gearhardt, was crooning to himself in a playpen on the porch. Twelve-year-old Clarence was sitting on the steps whittling. Uncle Heine sat in the living room vamping up his shot-gun. He was going hunting the next day. He set the rifle down when Clarence called to him, “Hey, Uncle Heine. Can I come with you tomorrow?”

“Of course, Clare,” Heine said, leaning out the screen door. He walked out onto the porch, sat down next to Clarence and put an arm around his shoulders. “Can you get away from the beets long enough? Will Brother Jake let you?”

“I think so, Uncle. I’m pretty sure he will.”

Neither of them noticed when George went into the house. Neither of them heard him dragging the gun across the floor to the screen door. They didn’t hear anything until the gun went off and Alicea wailed with pain. And young Gearhardt, well there was nothing much left of him but frothing bits of baby bone and blood.

It’s the essence of tragic accident to be an event that didn’t have to happen, that no one could have foreseen or they wouldn’t have done the small, apparently inconsequential thing that caused it. It’s one of those events that, afterwards, no one wants to think about ever again – but of course they have to. One of those things that God lets happen, God knows why. Did Grandma scream at Heine when she saw what was left of her boy? How could something like that happen and no one be to blame? If anyone was, it had to be Uncle Heine.

Poor Heine, some people seem doomed to be responsible for the misfortunes of others. Some drunk drivers kill; most don’t. Some smokers grind out the last bit of fire in a cigarette on a park trail and all they’re guilty of is littering; others do the same and they’ve started major conflagrations. They’ve burned down whole forests.

“Did Grandma or granddad blame Uncle Heine when you got shot?”

“Heine’s crazy, you know.” She frowned, trying to think about him but there was nothing else there. At least right then.

Odd about memory. She remembered that ninety-years-ago-train, that hulking, rocking, whistling night train and the adults hovering over her, terrified they would lose her too, passionately wishing her long life, loving her more than they knew how to say. She didn’t remember being shot. She didn’t remember that much more recently, a few decades ago, a doctor discovered shotgun pellets in her back that might explain her oscoleocis. The pellets have lasted years longer than the memory. She doesn’t remember her bit-by-bit curving spine, even though it’s always been there. Just the train that showed her how much her parents loved her. And Heine.

She used to wait in the evenings at New Dawning Home for Heine to come get her and take her home. Her life was an excursion; she’d overstayed and it wasn’t fun anymore. Night after night, he failed to come. But because she forgot he hadn’t almost as soon as he didn’t, she didn’t grow impatient or despairing. She just waited the next night, with the same eagerness as the night before.

“I’m tired of this,” she muttered.

“Yes, I can see you’re tired. I’m going to let you rest now.” At this rate, even the few memories she has left – small, warm, bejeweled with feeling – won’t be shared before they disappear forever. I kissed her forehead, a dry neutral sort of place that required nothing of me but a slight stoop and a slighter pucker. I never learned to hug my mother and still can’t, even now. I walked out of the room. I never walk out without seeing something in the way she watches me go, or maybe it’s a gesture without any of the usual defining characteristics of gesture, that says “Don’t go. Not yet. You’re the only person here who knows who I am.” But do I know? And whether I do or not, I want out. I don’t want to be here, doing claustrophobia in the emptying rooms of her mind.

What I want is for there to be a library somewhere – not a place that holds the usual sorts of books made of paper, glue, and leather-but an ethereal library where memories are kept until someone needs to check them out. It affirms the significance of our lives; what we remember isn’t just flotsam that dissipates when we’re gone; it’s all there still, wherever “there” is, stored, kept safe.

My mother will be able to check out memories and find herself again in them. Why not? If she doesn’t get there, if death or some other incapacitating condition prevents it, then I – looking through the stacks in Biography, (Dewey Decimal System 920-928 but organized alphabetically) – will check out her life and make what use of it I can. Biographers elaborate on what little they can discover, and so will I. And if memory is mostly imagination anyway, there’s no reason why I shouldn’t thumb through what I can find of her reminiscences and add a few riffs of my own.

I still don’t like the word “retirement” – a reply to Ronni Bennett

The word “retirement” continues to bother me. It’s not what many of us, artists and other older people alike are doing, and it’s effect is limiting on others.

In response to Roni Bennett’s Time Goes By post of April 28, I still don’t like the word “retirement” which means, according to my American Heritage dictionary: “to withdraw as for rest or seclusion,” “to go to bed,” “to take out of use or circulation.” Clearly, I’m all for social security, pension plans and tax breaks. My argument is with the primary meanings that have, I think, a negative effect on all of us. As I said in my post of a few days ago, Why would anyone want to “retire?” –

As if we were no longer involved in life, no longer active, no longer contributing, as if we were finished …. That certainly isn’t true of the artists I’ve described in my posts. I suspect that it’s not true of many ‘retirees.’

I’m sorry if I gave you or anyone the impression that artists have a “superior creative vision and dedication.” When I referred to their “privileged position,” I meant they were lucky – they have something they want to do or keep doing. They don’t have to come up with it at a late date. I certainly wasn’t talking only about famous artists. My blog is sometimes about myself and other people who are no more famous than I am, which is to say, not at all, though I do try to tell the stories of artists we’ve all heard of  who have grown old and are still creating since I think age brings with it special characteristics that make the arts even more interesting and revelatory. Which is one of the themes of the blog.

I probably should have tried to define more clearly what I mean by “artist” a long time ago: the best definition I can think of is a person who is driven to make things: pots, symphonies, poems on napkins, quilts, et. al. I think we’re all a bit bedeviled by our need to define and describe people and I’d like to keep the idea of artist as open and vague with possibilities as I can.

One of the reasons I’m not famous – one of many – is that I worked at jobs to make a living for years. I’ve always felt guilty that some people are able to do that and make art – a novel, even an occasional poem. I wasn’t. I retired at 62 instead of 65 because I wanted, even at this late age, to write, and have been struggling ever since to do so. I have no intention of stopping, of “retiring,” until I’m unable to go on.

It’s interesting that the first person to read that particular post was my partner who found it exhilarating because, at the age of 65 and after a lifetime of work that included everything from real estate to managing a heating and sheet metal business, she became the part-time Hallmark card lady at our local Walgreen’s. She loves the job, the sorting and organizing and the day-to-day contact with people. Although I’ve never said this to her, she’s one of the best social workers I ever met. Many of her customers are older people who come in to get a hug and encouraging word from her. She doesn’t consider herself retired, and dislikes the idea almost as much as I do.

At any rate, I think I can say with confidence that I have no argument with Ronni’s conclusion:

Those who retire from their lifelong jobs do so for many reasons and are not any less dedicated to what matters to them than famous writers, musicians and painters. It just becomes something different.

My only argument is with the word “retirement,” especially when it places limits on what people do with their lives.

Why would anyone want to “retire?”

Artists don’t “retire” – they just keep on working. Is retirement a healthy way to spend old age?

Of all the artists I’ve described on this blog, most have been driven in old age by a passion to do what they’ve always done-make art. As I read Ronni Bennett’s column in Wednesday’s Time Goes By, I began to wonder if artists are in a privileged position. They don’t retire, unless they’ve always had a day job and retirement means they can finally do their real work full-time. In my case, even when I wasn’t self-employed, my day job was never confining and always creative, so that retirement mostly meant that I got a Social Security check every month which, since I hadn’t paid much attention to my increasing age, seemed like an unexpected piece of good fortune.

I’ve never known quite what to do about the word “retirement.” It doesn’t describe what I do so I don’t like to use it label myself. On the other hand, it’s a simple way to fill in the blank on a form. I don’t have to explain anything. The reader of the form, the questioner, whoever, will just chuck me into the category of “retired” and I can go on about my life.

Ronni and several of her respondents were discussing what retirement means to them-”growing, learning, individuating, becoming all that we can be” – sounds good! – except that for some people it doesn’t seem all that wonderful. There are the physical problems of old age that are so much worse for some of us than for others and, of course, money problems and, as Ronni puts it, “a culture that does everything possible to marginalize old people.” Including, I might add, chuck them into the aforementioned category of “retirement.”

And that was when I realized what was bothering me about the column: the word “retirement.” As if we were no longer involved in life, no longer active, no longer contributing, as if we were finished …. That certainly isn’t true of the artists I’ve described in my posts. I suspect that it’s not true of many “retirees.”

Of the people Ronni Bennett quotes, one worries that “I find it often hard to just relax and enjoy and validate myself in retired activities.” She describes what she does and it all sounds useful and worthy, and some of it even fun, but then adds, “I still worry if I’m doing ‘enough’ with my energies.” Then, finally: “My question to those who’ve retired a decade or more is: Does it get easier to define yourself in internal, retired-type endeavors as the years go on?”

That’s exactly why I started writing this blog. I don’t want to do “retired activities.” Artists don’t have to; they just keep on going. I suspect that there are other people, not artists, who have something they need to do in “retirement.” Something that drives them. I can’t live without a purpose. I may never publish a good book, I don’t know. I just know I have to keep writing.

Of course, there are people who love a long holiday. More power to them. This woman doesn’t sound like one of them. She sounds like someone who needs to work.

Which reminds me of something else Ronni Bennett discusses: the importance of simply being, of being identified by something other than our jobs, an anomaly in the United States where we start conversations with strangers with the question, “And what do you do?” I spoke about being in my last post, or at least about some people who, as Jesse Jackson said about Dorothy Height, “beeeze.”

But, you know, not one the people I described there ever stopped working for what mattered to her or to him. Not one of them “retired.”

Being stereotyped

Stereotypes vary, but the ones that belong to aging are as difficult to defeat as all the others.

Growing up gay, I know what it is to be stereotyped, especially when the worst offender is your self. Nonetheless, prejudice is different in significant ways for gay people, people of minority races and ethnic groups, and old people. I remember when I was about 19-years-old and sitting in a room at the Wentley Hotel with a woman who was “out”- quietly, but in those days “out” was much more difficult to be. The red curtains in her room were tossing in a San Francisco breeze, and the street traffic there had a comfortable buzz about it to a neophyte city lover like me. She was playing a recording of “Were you there when they crucified my Lord”- one I guess that especially moved her. I don’t remember the singer, but I remember that the audio included the sound of the hammer as the nails were pounded into Jesus’ hands and feet.

“Sometimes,” she said, “I’m so glad that I was born homosexual instead of negro (yes, “negro,” – it was that long ago!). People can’t just look at me and see that I’m different. I can hide if I need to.”

No wonder it took me years more to admit my own homosexuality.

That was one of the big differences between most gay people and black people. I could hide. Which meant that, in addition to the shame associated with most probably being gay, I could agonize over my moral cowardice for not owning up to it.

Elderly people, like black people, are immediately and visibly different from whoever happens to be “normal” today. We become old. And, since the whole culture is dedicated to being young and staying young, we’ve had a long apprenticeship in becoming stereotypical. We fight old age from decade to decade, flattered when people tell us we’re younger than we look, happy when we can still play a good game of tennis at 60-something, more joyful still when we’re assured that “we don’t look a day over…”

But the day comes when we find ourselves indelibly and permanently old. We share old jokes with other old people. In fact, it’s a rare conversation between one oldster and another that doesn’t include at least one bit of humor about age, usually about our increasing decrepitude. The jokes, of course, are designed to make it all more bearable.

But again, there are differences between ageism and racism, sexism, and homophobia. For example, the jokes are rarer in the other groups – maybe because the prejudice has had such deadly consequences for so many years, maybe because being old means we were once young; we’ve been on top. Isn’t it ironic and “ha,ha,” “odd,” to suddenly find ourselves on the bottom. We don’t feel old. Our self image only gradually becomes as old as we are.

Aside from economic misfortunes and matters of life and death, the worst thing about being stereotyped is that people no longer see you for who you are. You’re old; you’re not Jim, Marian or Mildred. Of course, old means you can’t see, hear or move as well as you used to, and in the case of stereotyping that means the old part trumps all the other characteristics that once described us as individuals. But damned if I want to be defined by the problems of old age or, just as bad, by how well I overcome them.

Louise Nevelson didn’t take up the making of more colossal works of art in her 80s to amaze the world about her age and agility. Elliott Carter isn’t still writing music at 100 + to impress us about his age. He has music to write. For both of them and other old artists, creating is an imperative of who they are.

Roni Bennett of Time Goes By, wrote a couple of posts ago about the media’s pleasure in the new “reinvention of retirement.” Everything from seizing the day in new jobs to bungee jumping. In other words, being younger. She suggests that as she has spent a lifetime becoming who she is, she has no intention of reinventing herself. She’d rather become more and more truly who she is, learn from it, deepen it.

That’s one of the privileges of old age and one of the reasons that old people are so interesting.

The worst indignity is to be given a bedpan by a stranger who calls you by your first name. – Maggie Kuhn

Yes, we weaken and we weary. But we also have new strengths.

I began working in the same building Maggie Kuhn stopped working in in the very late ’60s or very early ’70s. Our paths never crossed. I was still very young and she was 65 and being pushed into retirement. People laughed that she’d been okay about it until she realized that they’d taken away her mimeograph machine. Then she was furious. Later, she wrote:

I was hurt, and then as time passed, outraged…. Something clicked and I realized that my problem was not mine alone. Instead of sinking into despair, I did what came most naturally to me: I telephoned some friends and called a meeting.

And that’s how the Gray Panthers began.

Gray Panthers demonstration for health care, San Francisco, June 19, 2008. Photo by Steve Rhodes. Creative Commons.

I know Maggie Kuhn wasn’t an artist; she was heart and soul a political activist. But she began what others have since continued, and that is to call attention to ageism and make a beginning at dispelling the myths that are attached to old age. That bedpan was her nightmare, and mine; it belongs to most of us who grow old. We begin to catch glimpses of the attitude that informs the bedpan story when a waiter is too deferential, when a taxi cab driver is overly solicitous, when some other stranger calls us “dear” one too many times. I saw people do it to my mother even before her dementia was apparent. They talked about her to each other, as if she weren’t there. They told her how adorable she looked when she really didn’t. No one called her that when she was 30, 40, 50.

I think that, despite all the exclamations to the contrary from elders who run cross-country or gerontologists who are surprised that old age is not a disease, most of us recognize we will grow less independent as we grow older: we won’t be able to pick up the same suitcase with the same aplomb or run up a flight of stairs. Not surprisingly, we vary widely. Across the street from me are two people, about my age, who are already stiff and immobile with arthritis. Next door to them lives Nora, who, at age 89, came over on a summer’s day with a pick axe to help me take the watsonia out of the hard, hard ground.

Roni Bennett of Time Goes By, who may already have done more than any one since Maggie Kuhn to discredit the stereotype of the old, complained bitterly in her post today about finding herself wearier and weaker at 69: Okay, Now I’m Pissed Off About Being Old! Since I’m a few months older than her at 70, and sometimes as weary, I found her post upsetting. I don’t know if lifting weights would help; some say it might. I do know I’m going to keep on doing everything I can and, I hope, more. Roni Bennett is trying to pack up and move. My current struggle has mostly to do with playing the piano. I discovered when I went back to it at 60, that it was much more difficult physically than I’d thought. Beethoven wears me out some days. And when I heard that  Alicia De  Larrocha complained at 79 that her reach was not as wide as it had once been, I knew I would never play a Beethoven sonata even remotely the way it should be played. My reach is shrinking, and I’m only me, not Alicia De  Larrocha. But I intend to keep trying to toughen up on the piano; I’m lucky, I truly don’t believe that Ludwig can hear me. And the trying feels good; the music is still amazing.

This blog has been another way of toughening up, trying to come up with something coherent and insightful every other day has been a wonderful exercise, and I’ve discovered through it and through the novels I’ve been struggling to write, that I write better today than I did 20, 30, 40 years ago. I believe more than ever that aging in someone with a need to create can be a blessing. Cicero, more than 2,000 years ago, said:

It is not by muscle, speed, or physical dexterity that great things are achieved, but by reflection, force of character, and judgment; in these qualities old age is usually not only not poorer, but it is even richer.

Cicero. The most famous bust of the most famous Roman orator. Photo by antmoose. Creative Commons.

Failing that, I’ll hang with Einstein: “How do I work?” he wrote. “I grope.”

“I am not an old lady!”

Why am I -why are we – so eager to fight old age when many of us are likely to spend decades of our lives being old?

A decade or more ago, when I was still in my fifties, I was walking across an icy Vermont parking lot on a dark snow-bright night with Jim, a thirteen-year-old boy of my acquaintance, when I slipped and came down hard on the ice. Since I was unhurt I got up quickly, a habit of independence I picked up long ago. Jim was staring at me wide-eyed. “I never saw an old lady fall down before!” he exclaimed. “Jim,” I snapped at him, “I am not an old lady.” I think he was surprised: why had I denied something that was as obviously as true as the snow was white?
Of course, to Jim I was an old lady, and when I was thirteen any woman of fifty or more would just as certainly have been one. I’ve wondered since, what did both Jim and I think an old lady was? Why was I so quick to refuse the description?

I’ve had time since then to observe my growing older, to notice how my first senior discounts made me squirm, and squirm again when more and more people junior to me jumped to open doors. My mother was also aging over this period of time and, needless to say, had a good many years on me. I scoffed inwardly when she worried whether she still looked younger than her several years younger sister. Why couldn’t she just accept that she was old? When she began to show symptoms of dementia and moved to her first assisted-living residence, I found myself surrounded by very old people and noticed with some chagrin, that they often assumed I was one of them, just as I had assumed I wasn’t that far removed from Jim in years, just an adult to his kid. I was fighting off old age the way I had many years before pushed away my lesbianism. Acting young was like acting straight. Don’t let anyone see that you’re not quite as agile, not quite as infatuated with the hunk in the office, as they are.

There’s the obvious thing about age, of course – that it’s closer to death. But what is it that makes us hate it so, when we will probably spend decades of our lives being old? Again, of course, there’s ill health. Even though we’re told now that old age is not a disease and that, as we learn to cope with illness, being elderly will seem more attractive, most of us know that we are terribly vulnerable to all sorts of micro-organisms, cancers and god-knows-what.

The vaunted wisdom of old age is no solace. Wisdomless old people surely outnumber the wise.

Nonetheless, more and more of us are leading productive and interesting lives. And for at least some artists, there are definitely benefits that come with being elderly, and that will enrich all of us – which is what this blog is all about.

I think we can assume that we hate and fear getting old because of illness and death. We live in a culture consumed with the worship of youth and fear of death. We believe every malady should be curable. Recently, Ronnie Bennett, the proprietor of Time Goes By, the most comprehensive blog about aging on the Internet, decided to sit down and watch TV two or three hours to see whether or not there were as many ads about care and cure as she thought:

That much time was not needed. I was shocked to find that in the period of one, three-minute commercial break, remedies for the following diseases and conditions were advertised: COPD, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, dry skin, headache, insomnia, allergies, nasal congestion, foot problems, heart disease, constipation and depression.

We don’t want to feel vulnerable, and that’s exactly what the culture assumes old people are, almost by definition. We were all raised to be independent, self-determining adults. So, when someone is of a certain age, we assume they’re doddering and assign them a certain vulnerability. That’s why there was an automobile accident; that’s why she fell down. The stereotype becomes grotesque. The irrational old lady and her house full of cats. The absent-minded old gent who can’t find his way from point a to point b. Less is expected of old people, since we’re on the very brink of decrepitude, if we’re not already there.

So many of the programs for the old condescend. When my mother was in her last residence, she was cared for by feeling, kind people. But the same people, in particular the director of the program, had a bad habit of exclaiming, “She’s so cute,” when she sat down to play the few tired chords she could still muster on the piano, when she threw her food across the room, when she fought taking a shower. Sometimes, it was “She’s so sweet.” And I knew my mother was neither, just a human being in a bad situation.

I think that what we fear in old age even more than death is the condescension that’s reserved for the vulnerable. Like my mother before me, but I hope with fewer strikes against me, I intend to battle it to the end.

Old Artists

Not long ago, as I was getting it together to write my first post for this blog, I stumbled across two editorial comments about aging that make a first-rate context for what I want to say. The first was by Nancy Perry Graham, the editor of AARP The Magazine in its January/February issue. The occasion for it was her attendance with some other editors of the magazine—all of them wearing AARP T-shirts embossed with their publication’s September/October cover of “the Boss”—at a Springsteen performance at Giants Stadium in New York.

Staring wide-eyed at them, a curious woman asked: “Why would you wear an AARP T-shirt to a Springsteen concert?” The editor explained who they were, adding that Springsteen himself was 60.

But why would you want people to know you’re old?” she replied.

The story is made more poignant by the fact that she was a 60-something-year-old.

On the same day I saw that item, I read Roni Bennet’s post in her blog, TIME GOES BY. She remembered that she’d been depressed after years of research into aging when she found the same theme again and again in the culture- “that getting old is entirely about debility, decline and disease.” She began her blog to write about what growing old is “really like.” Now, five-going-on-six years later, in a country with an exploding population of people over fifty-five, she finds that the culture is enthusiastically pitching elixirs to make us young again, and potions to cure us of all the maladies of growing old. Aging continues to be defined as deterioration.

“Nothing has changed since I started TGB,” she concludes. “So much for any influence it might have.”

In another mood, Roni Bennett, who hosts what is probably the most influential blog on aging on the Internet, might not be so pessimistic. Late in the last century, the world began to discover that aging didn’t have to mean decline-that many of the so-called problems of aging could be overcome. Surely, some of the marketing of cures has its genesis in this more optimistic view. But what’s really exciting is what the late Gene D. Cohen wrote in his report, “Research on Creativity and Aging: the Positive Impact of the Arts on Health and Illness.” “The next step was another big leap…,” he said. It was about “the potential of aging.”

Elliott Carter

Old age can be something to look forward to. It can be an especially fruitful time for people in the arts. Take composer Elliott Carter who, last year-at the age of 100-attended the premiere of his latest work in Carnegie Hall. Alex Ross in the January 5, 2009 New Yorker, declared, “He seems finally and fully himself.”

Carter is one of many elderly composers, and others only recently deceased, who have dominated classical music in the United States for the last several decades. If you would rather talk about folk music, there’s always 90-year-old Pete Seeger; or jazz, singer Etta James; and rock, well, don’t forget Bruce Springsteen. There are elderly artists of every kind everywhere.

The Inaugural Concert. Photo by Sam Bailey, January 19, 2009 Flickr

We’re legion-old people doing art—some of us more accomplished than others, some better known, but many of us exciting, and even better, excited.

And that’s what this blog will be all about.

<!– START OF ADDME LINK –>
<a href=”http://www.addme.com/submission/free-submission-start.php”>Search Engine Submission – AddMe</a>
<!– END OF ADDME LINK –>